Friday, July 14, 2006
YOUTUBE, SEXIST & GAY ORIENTED
Recently, yet another video of mine was rejected and marked as "inappropriate" on the Google owned service called "Youtube." Of course no reason was given, but the obvious existence of hundreds if not thousands of videos containing full frontal male nudity (many including masturbation to completion, and erections) suggests that YouTube caters to women and gays or is run by woman and gays! I'm pondering a move of all my videos from YouTube to another less, sexist and gay pandering video hosting site. What do you think? Feedback please.
Click to download the socalled "inappropriate" video
NEWSFLASH: Fascism rears its ugly head again. The video below was deleted on 7/14/06 by Youtube. It was rejected as being "inappropriate!"
¶ 8:53 AM Click to download the socalled "inappropriate" video
NEWSFLASH: Fascism rears its ugly head again. The video below was deleted on 7/14/06 by Youtube. It was rejected as being "inappropriate!"
Comments:
<< Home
I've always thought that about Youtube. Have no idea what they are trying to prove but yes, they seem to have a big issue with videos showing naked women.
# posted by 
: 8:55 AM
: 8:55 AM
It's my response to one of your old postings entitled Structure, Sign and Play. Maybe you took it out.
The discourse on human bdy creates irreducible dichotomy to body by forbidding 'naked body' to signify 'clothed body,' and both of which give a structure to the discourse, and the discourse gives a structure...
I am a rather rare breed of an exhibitionist for years. My interest in exhibitionism extends to studying exhibitionism itself philosophically. Almost universally, nudity if forbidden, and yet highly praised and even glorified in private: such a state of perpectual inconsequence has been practiced in both private life and in public life. Even in academic fields, 'naked body' is almost universally black listed without apparent reasons. (at least in social sciences) And it is almost never studied inter-departmentally. In short, it cannot be properly said to have been studied; it is only at its infancy. Wehn I first discovered your website and most noteworthy work "joe public" I was quite intrigued both personally and intellectually.
For quite some time, I was contemplating a message outside the context of what is shown in the pictures/videos. After I read your blog entry, things started to make sense. (finally) In short, I guess you are 'demonstrating' something through your work, which I do not dare mention. If I am right, JD wrote for him, who wrote for him, who wrote for him, etc. Now I wonder if you videotaped for you, who videotaped for you, who videotaped for you, etc, or, say, 'Cory' videotaped for himself, who videotaped for himself, who videotaped for himself, etc?
Thanx for a great job.
PS The correct spelling is 'Saussurian,' I suppose. This never ending cycle in the discourse and the structure is more of a headache than anything else. One mystery though is that eroticism may be a result of such a dichotomy, or should I join plato for symposium and say 'eros' requires no dichotomy?
The discourse on human bdy creates irreducible dichotomy to body by forbidding 'naked body' to signify 'clothed body,' and both of which give a structure to the discourse, and the discourse gives a structure...
I am a rather rare breed of an exhibitionist for years. My interest in exhibitionism extends to studying exhibitionism itself philosophically. Almost universally, nudity if forbidden, and yet highly praised and even glorified in private: such a state of perpectual inconsequence has been practiced in both private life and in public life. Even in academic fields, 'naked body' is almost universally black listed without apparent reasons. (at least in social sciences) And it is almost never studied inter-departmentally. In short, it cannot be properly said to have been studied; it is only at its infancy. Wehn I first discovered your website and most noteworthy work "joe public" I was quite intrigued both personally and intellectually.
For quite some time, I was contemplating a message outside the context of what is shown in the pictures/videos. After I read your blog entry, things started to make sense. (finally) In short, I guess you are 'demonstrating' something through your work, which I do not dare mention. If I am right, JD wrote for him, who wrote for him, who wrote for him, etc. Now I wonder if you videotaped for you, who videotaped for you, who videotaped for you, etc, or, say, 'Cory' videotaped for himself, who videotaped for himself, who videotaped for himself, etc?
Thanx for a great job.
PS The correct spelling is 'Saussurian,' I suppose. This never ending cycle in the discourse and the structure is more of a headache than anything else. One mystery though is that eroticism may be a result of such a dichotomy, or should I join plato for symposium and say 'eros' requires no dichotomy?
# posted by : 5:01 AM
: 5:01 AM
Q: what's the MOST important objective
N our lifelong demise determined by us?
A: achieving Seventh-Heaven: in the
Great Beyond, everythang is possible.
When our eternal soul leaves our body at death
and we riseabove to meet our Maker,
only four, last things remain:
death, judgement, Heaven or Hell
according to the deeds WEE mortals
have done in our Finite Existence.
Find-out what RCIA means and join.
PS° I'm a re-boot NDE:
if you're RIGHT,
you'll see the LIGHT -
follow that to the Elysian Fields.
Let's be tethered2forever Upstairs.
Make Your Choice -SAW
N our lifelong demise determined by us?
A: achieving Seventh-Heaven: in the
Great Beyond, everythang is possible.
When our eternal soul leaves our body at death
and we riseabove to meet our Maker,
only four, last things remain:
death, judgement, Heaven or Hell
according to the deeds WEE mortals
have done in our Finite Existence.
Find-out what RCIA means and join.
PS° I'm a re-boot NDE:
if you're RIGHT,
you'll see the LIGHT -
follow that to the Elysian Fields.
Let's be tethered2forever Upstairs.
Make Your Choice -SAW
Q: what's the MOST important objective
N our lifelong demise determined by us?
A: achieving Seventh-Heaven: in the
Great Beyond, everythang is possible.
When our eternal soul leaves our body at death
and we riseabove to meet our Maker,
only four, last things remain:
death, judgement, Heaven or Hell
according to the deeds WEE mortals
have done in our Finite Existence.
Find-out what RCIA means and join.
PS° I'm a re-boot NDE:
if you're RIGHT,
you'll see the LIGHT -
follow that to the Elysian Fields.
Let's be tethered2forever Upstairs.
Make Your Choice -SAW
Post a Comment
N our lifelong demise determined by us?
A: achieving Seventh-Heaven: in the
Great Beyond, everythang is possible.
When our eternal soul leaves our body at death
and we riseabove to meet our Maker,
only four, last things remain:
death, judgement, Heaven or Hell
according to the deeds WEE mortals
have done in our Finite Existence.
Find-out what RCIA means and join.
PS° I'm a re-boot NDE:
if you're RIGHT,
you'll see the LIGHT -
follow that to the Elysian Fields.
Let's be tethered2forever Upstairs.
Make Your Choice -SAW
<< Home
